The ‘greenhouse effect’ – still an artificial and unrealistic postulate!

In 1982 Pelican Books published John Gribbin’s book “Future Weather – Carbon Dioxide, Climate and the Greenhouse Effect”. After his Ph.D. in astrophysics at the University of Cambridge he worked on the editorial staff of the journal Nature. He confesses frankly: “What little I know of this immense subject has been learned over more than a decade as a journalist and science writer reporting on the theme, initially from a position of great ignorance.” He starts with the words: “We live in exiting times, and the mystery of the changing climate provides one of the most exiting current scientific puzzles”. Then: “This is a book about the greenhouse effect – the possibility that a build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere may lead to a warming of the Earth in our lifetimes.” Yet before entering any discussion he shows again his “position of great ignorance” and propagates a malicious error of judgment.

Read more

Why Politics believe in IPCC?

The answer to this question seems to be very simple: The Politicians believe in IPCC because they have installed this Panel of ‘climate experts’. The experts give them an alibi and a justification for regulating global politics. They promise a better world with more global climate fairness.

Read more

H. Leighton Steward: “Fire, Ice and Paradise”

In 2009 H. Leighton Steward, a New York Times bestselling author, published an excellent book “Fire, Ice and Paradise”.  The book is well organized and written for non-specialists in an easily understandable language. It is instructive and convincing. The panel IPCC will have great problems to argument against the many driving forces which are responsible for the never ending climate change. Climate changed before people were on Earth and will forever change in unpredictable time scales. With this historical overview as a professional geologist Steward points in the right direction.

Read more

Fourth International Conference on Climate Change, May 16-18, 2010

To The President of the Heartland Institute

Mr. Joseph Bast

Read more

Dr. Harlan L. Watson Senior Climate Negotiator and Special Representative Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Department of State Washington D. C. 20520 USA

Dear Dr. Watson,

last month you were in Germany and made an interview with the paper FAZ. I agree totally with the president of the United States of America, George W. Bush, in denying the Koyto protocol. But what I can’t understand is that the President and you seem to believe in the “greenhouse effect” and in the possibility that man can influence the climate by reducing the carbon dioxide in the air.

Read more

Wolfgang’s Workshop of Atmospheric Physics Radiation in the Atmosphere

Everything emits radiation. Any solid or liquid body not at absolute zero transmits energy to its surroundings by radiation. The warmer an object is, the more radiation energy it emits, and the shorter is the wavelength that characterizes that radiation. The further a receiver is from the radiation source, the less radiation is received. If we increase a distance r1 from a body to a distance r2, the radiation intensity reaching this body will be reduced by the factor (r1/r2)2. The dependence is known as the ‘inverse square law’ for radiation.

Read more

Sensors Directorate and/or Information Directorate

Ladies and gentleman,

the Information Resource Center of the Embassy of the United States of America in Berlin gave me your address. I’m writing you because I‘m very much interested in air and space sensors, especially infrared sensors for purposes of remote sensing.

Read more

Green pressure groups get €66 million from the EU

Have you ever wondered why the eco-lobby is so pro-EU? Now you have your answer. Green pressure groups are becoming financially dependent on Brussels. Ten years ago, they received €2,337,924 from the European Commission; last year, it was €8,749,940.

A study by the International Policy Network reveals the extent to which Green lobbyists look to the EU for their income: Climate Action Network, Friends of the Earth, WWF, they’re all at it. Much of this money, the paper shows, is then recycled into lobbying the EU.

You see how the system works? The EU pays eco-lobbyists to tell it what it wants to hear. Its clients, naturally enough, tell it that the EU ought to increase its powers. A similar racket goes on between Brussels and the mega-charities (see here).

This isn’t just bad for democracy; it’s bad for the environment, because it equates conservation with state intervention and supranationalism. One of these Brussels-funded organisations recently produced a league of which MEPs were greenest. I like to think that I am pretty eco-conscious. I try never to fly or drive when trains are an option; Mrs H sources food locally, and reuses and recycles meticulously; we even had washable nappies for our children. But I came near the bottom of the table because I had voted consistently against giving more power to Brussels.

That’s the Left for you, I suppose, elevating motive over action, valuing the moralistic over the moral.

Daniel Hannan

Daniel Hannan is a writer and journalist, and has been Conservative MEP for South East England since 1999. He speaks French and Spanish and loves Europe, but believes that the EU is making its constituent nations poorer, less democratic and less free. He is the winner of the Bastiat Award for online journalism.